<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com</link>
		<description>The latest articles from Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health (ISSN 1745-0179) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/19"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/18"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/17"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/16"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/15"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/14"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/13"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/10"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/19">
            
            <title>Depressive symptoms and perceived burdens related to being a student: Survey in three European countries</title>
			<description>Background:
Despite a high prevalence of depressive symptoms among university students, few studies have examined how this mental health problem is associated with perceived stress and perceived burdens related to being a student.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 2,103 first year students from one western (Germany), one central (Poland), and one south-eastern European country (Bulgaria). The self-administered questionnaires included the modified Beck Depression Inventory and Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale. A 13 item scale measured perceived burdens related to being a student with four subscales: "Course work", "Relationships", "Isolation", and "Future". 
Results:
Depressive symptoms were highly prevalent in all three countries (M-BDI 35: 34% in Poland, 39% in Bulgaria, and 23% in Germany). Students felt more burdened by course work and bad job prospects ("Future") than by relationship problems or by feelings of isolation. The perceived burdens subscales "Future", "Relationship" and "Isolation" remained associated with depressive symptoms after adjusting for perceived stress, which displayed a strong association with depressive symptoms. The association between perceived stress and depressive symptoms differed by gender. These findings were similar in all three countries. 
Conclusions:
Perceived burdens related to studying are positively associated with higher depression scores among students, not only by mediation through perceived stress but also directly. While the strong association between perceived stress and depressive symptoms suggests the need for interventions that improve stress management, perceived burdens should also be addressed.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/19</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Rafael T Mikolajczyk, Annette E Maxwell, Vihra Naydenova, Sabine Meier and Walid El Ansari</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:19</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-19</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-03</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/18">
            
            <title>Duloxetine and suicide attempts: a possible relation</title>
			<description>The possible increase of suicidal ideation with some antidepressants is still a matter of debate. We are reporting two cases of suicidal attempt that occurred concomitantly with the use of Duloxetine. To our knowledge there is no prior publication about a possible Duloxetine related increase in the risk of suicidality .</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/18</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Bilal A Salem and Elie G Karam</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:18</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-18</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/17">
            
            <title>Knowledge about childhood autism among health workers (KCAHW) questionnaire: description, reliability and internal consistency</title>
			<description>Background:
Knowledge and awareness about childhood autism is low among health workers and the general community in Nigeria and other Sub-Saharan African countries. Poor knowledge and awareness about childhood autism, especially among health workers can compromise early recognition and interventions which had been known to improve prognosis in children with autism. In formulating policy and designing interventions for these children, there is need to develop a reliable tool that can be used in assessing baseline knowledge about childhood autism among health workers and the impact that future continued education and awareness campaign may have on such baseline knowledge. Knowledge about childhood autism among health workers (KCAHW) questionnaire was designed for this purpose.
Methods:
The KCAHW questionnaire is a nineteen (19) item self-administered questionnaire that is divided into four domains. KCAHW questionnaires were distributed to fifty (50) psychiatric nurses involved in community mental health services in South-Eastern Nigeria to complete. After two weeks period, the KCAHW questionnaires were re-administered to the same fifty (50) psychiatric nurses to assess their knowledge about childhood autism and to assess the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of this questionnaire.
Results:
KCAHW questionnaire showed good test-retest reliability when the mean domain and total scores at first and second time administration were compared. The four mean domain scores and the mean total scores at first and second time administration were significantly correlated. The questionnaire also had a good overall internal consistency when the mean scores of the four domains were correlated with mean total scores (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97).
Conclusion:
The KCAHW questionnaire is a reliable tool for assessing knowledge of health workers about childhood autism. It would be a useful tool in improving early recognition of features of autism among affected children in Sub-Saharan African and other developing countries of the world where knowledge and awareness about childhood autism is low.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/17</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Muideen O Bakare, Peter O Ebigbo, Ahamefule O Agomoh and Nkem C Menkiti</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:17</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-17</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/16">
            
            <title>Variables associated with physical fighting among US high-school students</title>
			<description>Background:
Violence among adolescents is an important public health problem in the United States. This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of having been engaged in physical fighting on school property and associated factors of the behavior among school-going adolescents in the United States.
Methods:
This study was based on secondary analysis of the United States Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) conducted in 2005. The sampling frame included all private and public school in the country, stratified by region and urbanicity based on the US census bureau data. Frequencies and proportions were obtained for the outcome and explanatory variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the level of association between explanatory variables and the outcome (having been involved in a physical fight).
Results:
Of the 13,857 respondents, 13.5% (18.2% for males and 8.8% for females) reported physical fighting onschool property in the last 12 months to the survey. Males were more likely to have been in a physical fight than females (OR = 2.23; 95% CI [1.89, 2.63]). Respondents aged 17 years or older were less likely to report physical fighting than those who were 14 years or younger. Compared to Whites, American Indians or Alaska Natives, Blacks, Native Hawaii or other Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics were more likely to report physical fighting on school property (OR = 2.11; 95% CI [1.22, 3.66], OR = 1.72; 95% CI [1.42, 2.0], OR = 2.18; 95% CI [1.01, 4.79], and OR = 1.74; 95% CI [1.41, 2.16] respectively). Physical fighting on school property was also positively associated with cigarette smoking (OR = 1.70; 95% CI [1.37, 2.10]), drinking alcohol (OR = 1.45; 95% CI [1.20, 1.76]), use of illegal drugs (OR = 1.73; 95% CI [1.42, 2.12]), having had property stolen or deliberately damaged on school property (OR = 2.06; 95% CI [1.74, 2.44]), having been threatened or injured with a weapon on school property (OR = 2.63; 95% CI [2.06, 3.34]), and playing videogame three or more hours a day (OR = 1.29; 95% CI [1.07, 1.56]).
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that physical fighting among US High School students is widespread and positively associated with victimization (having been threatened or injured with a weapon on school property) and other risky behaviors such as smoking, alcohol and drugs use. Intervention programs to prevent/control those risky behaviors as well as further attention on the association between physical fighting and victimization at school through longitudinal research are warranted.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/16</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Emmanuel Rudatsikira, Adamson S Muula and Seter Siziya</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:16</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-16</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/15">
            
            <title>Psychological problems in gastroenterology outpatients: A South Australian experience. Psychological co-morbidity in IBD, IBS and hepatitis C</title>
			<description>Background:
In independent studies, IBD, IBS and HCV have each been associated with a substantially increased risk of psychological problems such as depression and anxiety and impairment of quality of life compared to the general healthy population. However, the relative psychological burden for each of these diagnoses is unknown as it has never been compared contemporaneously at one institution. Current local data are therefore needed to enable an evidence-based allocation of limited clinical psychological resources.
Methods:
Overall, 139 outpatients (64 IBD, 41 HCV, and 34 IBS) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The HADS, SCL90, SF-12 and appropriate disease-specific activity measures were administered. Differences between groups were assesed with ANOVA, the Chi-Square test and the independent samples t-test (two-tailed).
Results:
Each of the three groups had significantly lower quality of life than the general population (p &lt; 0.05). Overall, a total of 58 (42%) participants met HADS screening criteria for anxiety and 26 (19%) participants for depression. The HCV group had a significantly higher prevalence of depression than either of the other groups (HCV = 34%, IBS = 15% and IBD = 11%, p = 0.009). In the SCL90, the three disease groups differed on 7 out of 12 subscales. On each of these subscales, the HCV group were most severely affected and differed most from the general population.
Conclusion:
Patients with these common chronic gastrointestinal diseases have significant impairment of quality of life. Anxiety is a greater problem than depression, although patients with HCV in particular, should be regularly monitored and treated for co-morbid depression. Evaluation of specific psychological interventions targeting anxiety is warranted.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/15</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Antonina A Mikocka-Walus, Deborah A Turnbull, Jane M Andrews, Nicole T Moulding, Ian G Wilson, Hugh AJ Harley, David J Hetzel and Gerald J Holtmann</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:15</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/14">
            
            <title>Usefulness of the Spanish version of the mood disorder questionnaire for screening bipolar disorder in routine clinical practice in outpatients with major depression</title>
			<description>Background:
According to some studies, almost 40% of depressive patients &#8211; half of them previously undetected &#8211; are diagnosed of bipolar II disorder when systematically assessed for hypomania. Thus, instruments for bipolar disorder screening are needed. The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a self-reported questionnaire validated in Spanish in stable patients with a previously known diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate in the daily clinical practice the usefulness of the Spanish version of the MDQ in depressive patients.
Methods:
Patients (n = 87) meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for a major depressive episode, not previously known as bipolar were included. The affective module of the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) was used as gold standard.
Results:
MDQ screened 24.1% of depressive patients as bipolar, vs. 12.6% according to SCID. For a cut-off point score of 7 positive answers, sensitivity was 72.7% (95% CI = 63.3 &#8211; 82.1) and specificity 82.9% (95% CI = 74.9&#8211;90.9). Likelihood ratio of positive and negative tests were 4,252 y 0,329 respectively.LimitationsThe small sample size reduced the power of the study to 62%.
Conclusion:
Sensitivity and specificity of the MDQ were high for screening bipolar disorder in patients with major depression, and similar to the figures obtained in stable patients. This study confirms that MDQ is a useful instrument in the daily clinical assessment of depressive patients.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/14</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Consuelo de Dios, Elena Ezquiaga, Aurelio Garc&#237;a, Jos&#233; Manuel Montes, Caridad Avedillo and Bego&#241;a Soler</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:14</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-14</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/13">
            
            <title>What every psychiatrist should know about PANDAS: a review</title>
			<description>The term Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcus infections (PANDAS) was coined by Swedo et al. in 1998 to describe a subset of childhood obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD) and tic disorders triggered by group-A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus pyogenes infection. Like adult OCD, PANDAS is associated with basal ganglia dysfunction. Other putative pathogenetic mechanisms of PANDAS include molecular mimicry and autoimmune-mediated altered neuronal signaling, involving calcium-calmodulin dependent protein (CaM) kinase II activity. Nonetheless the contrasting results from numerous studies provide no consensus on whether PANDAS should be considered as a specific nosological entity or simply a useful research framework. Herein we discuss available data that could provide insight into pathophysiology of adult OCD, or might explain cases of treatment-resistance. We also review the latest research findings on diagnostic and treatment.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/13</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Germana Moretti, Massimo Pasquini, Gabriele Mandarelli, Lorenzo Tarsitani and Massimo Biondi</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:13</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-13</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/12">
            
            <title>Admission to a psychiatric unit and changes in tobacco smoking</title>
			<description>Smoking and withdrawal from smoking complicates the assessment and treatment of mental illness. We aimed to establish whether psychiatric inpatients smoke different amounts after admission than beforehand and, if so, to find out why. Forty-three inpatients on a working age adult psychiatry ward completed self-report questionnaires about smoking habits. Those who smoked a different amount after admission had a follow-up interview to find out why they thought this had occurred. The interview incorporated qualitative and quantitative aspects which were analysed accordingly.Fifty-six percent of participants were smokers before admission, rising to 70% afterwards. Of the smokers, 17% smoked less after admission, and 63% smoked more. The average number of cigarettes smoked per person per day increased from five to thirteen. The main reasons for smoking more were boredom, stress and the wish to socialise.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/12</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Suzy Ker and David Owens</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:12</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/11">
            
            <title>Clozapine and co-prescribed psychotropics: a short report</title>
			<description>Clozapine is the drug of choice in treatment resistant schizophrenia. It reduces hospitalizations. Patients on clozapine are often co-prescribed other psychotropics. This report looks at a sample of twenty patients on clozapine. It finds that almost two thirds were on a psychotropic along with clozapine. Eight individuals were on an antidepressant; seven on an antipsychotic and five were on co-prescribed valproate. The clinical implications are discussed and a need to look at health services involving clozapine is suggested.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/11</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Maneesh Gupta</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:11</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/10">
            
            <title>The factor structure of the twelve item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): the result of negative phrasing?</title>
			<description>Background:
The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is used routinely as a unidimensional measure of psychological morbidity. Many factor-analytic studies have reported that the GHQ-12 has two or three dimensions, threatening its validity. It is possible that these 'dimensions' are the result of the wording of the GHQ-12, namely its division into positively phrased (PP) and negatively phrased (NP) statements about mood states. Such 'method effects' introduce response bias which should be taken into account when deriving and interpreting factors.
Methods:
GHQ-12 data were obtained from the 2004 cohort of the Health Survey for England (N = 3705). Following exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the goodness of fit indices of one, two and three factor models were compared with those of a unidimensional model specifying response bias on the NP items, using structural equation modelling (SEM). The hypotheses were (1) the variance of the responses would be significantly higher for NP items than for PP items because of response bias, and (2) that the modelling of response bias would provide the best fit for the data.
Results:
Consistent with previous reports, EFA suggested a two-factor solution dividing the items into NP and PP items. The variance of responses to the NP items was substantially and significantly higher than for the PP items. The model incorporating response bias was the best fit for the data on all indices (RMSEA = 0.068, 90%CL = 0.064, 0.073). Analysis of the frequency of responses suggests that the response bias derives from the ambiguity of the response options for the absence of negative mood states.
Conclusion:
The data are consistent with the GHQ-12 being a unidimensional scale with a substantial degree of response bias for the negatively phrased items. Studies that report the GHQ-12 as multidimensional without taking this response bias into account risk interpreting the artefactual factor structure as denoting 'real' constructs, committing the methodological error of reification. Although the GHQ-12 seems unidimensional as intended, the presence of such a large response bias should be taken into account in the analysis of GHQ-12 data.</description>
			<link>http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/4/1/10</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Matthew Hankins</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2008, 4:10</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-24</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1745-0179</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
